diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'concepts')
| -rw-r--r-- | concepts/included-third.html | 27 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | concepts/temps-commun.html | 64 |
2 files changed, 79 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/concepts/included-third.html b/concepts/included-third.html index 5ce3d88..b908f3a 100644 --- a/concepts/included-third.html +++ b/concepts/included-third.html @@ -18,34 +18,37 @@ Included Third logic considers the relation between objects rather then objects themselves, as explained by Stephane Lupasco the included third takes place as a element associating the 2 elements of a contradiction, letting one and other possibility to both exist. This logic trains us towards inclusive thinking taking in account all parameters even if they are not in the direct scope of the observer. </section> <section id="sources"> <h4>Sources</h4> - <h3> <a href="../authors/basarab-nicolescu.html> Basarab Nicolescu attributes it to Stephane Lupasco </a> </h3> + <h3> <a href="../authors/basarab-nicolescu.html"> Basarab Nicolescu refers to the notion developed by Stephane Lupasco </a> </h3> </section> <section id="exploitation"> - <h3> Quatum physics has taught us how to think</h3> + <h3> Quantum physics has taught us how to think.</h3> - The notion of the included third is directly derived from quantum physics understanding, Excluding binary logic considers that what cannot enter in the resolution of a problematic is excluded unacoutable of it,“an individual’s (or group’s) ability to make effective choices and to transform those choices into desired outcomes” -Included third logic transforms contradiction into something inclusive;each time there is a relation, there is also an included third derived from this relation that is part of the conditions of its existence. + The notion of the included third is directly derived from a quantum physics understanding, while traditional excluding binary logic considers: what cannot enter in the resolution of a problematic is excluded and becomes unacoutable in the decision process, it hinders “an individual’s (or group’s) ability to make effective choices and to transform those choices into desired outcomes”, as decisional process becomes excluding, biased. +From a different stance, included third logic transforms contradiction into something inclusive; each time there is a relation, it considers there is also an included third derived from this relation that is part of the conditions of its existence, allowing for a multiplicity of possibilities. -When aristotelian logics premisces are either A or non A Included Third logics insists it is both A and nonA as what associates them is an Included Third. An included third logic allows us to view the complexity of our environment, making it difficult to think our reality in the limit of the knowledge and context of the observer, typically it becomes impossible to think in terms of what benefits a nation, or exclude cosequences like pollution, as if one situated point of view is valid, other assumptions are equally, and our system and life happens in the relation between all elements. +In a decisional and in an analytical process, when aristotelian logic's asks us to choose between either A or non A, as a premisce for our reasonning and acting, included third logic insists both A and non A are valid, as what associates them is a relational process, an Included Third. An included third logic allows us to view the complexity of our environment, making it difficult to think our reality the in the sole limit of the observer's knowledge and context; it forces us to acknowledge the always included third that can take multiple forms. Typically it becomes impossible to think in terms of what benefits a nation, or exclude cosequences like pollution, indeed, if one situated point of view is valid, other assumptions are equally, and our system and life happens in the relation between all elements. </section> - <section id="tree of significance"> - <h4>SYNONYM:</h4> Quantum Logic -<h4>ANTONYM:</h4> Exclusive thinking, Reductionism, Domination. -<h4>HYPERNYM:</h4> A larger logic still needs to be understood -<h4>HYPONYM:</h4> Aristotelian logic is included. -</section> - <section id="resistance"> + +<section id="resistance"> Included Third is a useful relational concept in political thinking, it can be activated in political terms to respond to reductionnist and protectionists discourses. </section> <section id="detournament"> Included Third logic is processual, and results in always in transformation resolution, in order to allow for effective realisation it must be associated to decisional processes and clear political positionning. </section> + + <section id="tree of significance"> + <h4>SYNONYM:</h4> Quantum Logic +<h4>ANTONYM:</h4> Exclusive thinking, Reductionism, Domination. +<h4>HYPERNYM:</h4> A larger logic still needs to be understood. +<h4>HYPONYM:</h4> Aristotelian logic is included. +</section> + </article> <nav> <ul> diff --git a/concepts/temps-commun.html b/concepts/temps-commun.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..be987a3 --- /dev/null +++ b/concepts/temps-commun.html @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html> +<html> + <head> + <meta charset="UTF-8"> + <title> Ici THK — Common Time </title> + <link rel="stylesheet" href="../assets/css/style.css"> + </head> + <body> + <header> + <h1> <a href="../index.html">Ici THK</a> </h1> + <h2> Common Time </h2> + <h3> Time series</h3> + </header> + <main> + <article> + <section id="concept"> + <h4>About the Concept</h4> + Common time is a concept derived from questionning intermingled individual times. + </section> + <section id="sources"> + <h4>Sources</h4> + <h3>Le temps, c’est d’abord ce qui se partage : ce qui s’expérimente comme temps commun. Temps dont les fibres symbolisent le devenir de l’être ensemble, à la fois continu et discontinu, trame tissée qui tient malgré tout. Le temps commun est par nature hétérogène à la logique qui guide le monde du capital et de son « développement ».</h3> <li><em>Les fibres du temps, Bernard Aspe, Antiphilosophique Collection, 2018</em></li> + </section> + + <section id="exploitation"> + + <h3> Common Time and waven fibres </h3> + + + </section> + <section id="tree of significance"> + <h4>SYNONYM:</h4> Relation +<h4>ANTONYM:</h4> sameness +<h4>HYPERNYM:</h4> +<h4>HYPONYM:</h4> matter, object, thing, body, infrastructure, informatics. + +</section> + <section id="resistance"> + Agency being both a political and a relational concept it can be activated in political terms if all its constituent are in a moving relational scheme of discreet materials. + +</section> +<section> Tim Ingold argues: "things are active not because they are imbued with agency but because of ways in which they are caught up in these currents of the lifeworld. The properties of materials, then, are not fixed attributes of matter but are processual and relational. To describe these properties means telling their stories." (Ingold, 2007, p. 1) + </section> + <section id="detournament"> + Agential Memory, uses narrative procedures to help us to understand the complexity of our constructed memory and situate back into them a form of agential realism.relational nature of the matter, or things under discussion, + </section> + </article> + <nav> + <ul> + <li><a href="../authors/bernard-aspe.html">ASPE</a></li> + <li><a href="../authors/karen-barad.html">BARAD</a></li> + <li><a href="../authors/muriel-combes.html">COMBES</a></li> + <li><a href="../authors/stephane-lupasco.html">LUPASCO</a></li> + <li><a href="../authors/deborah-lupton.html">LUPTON</a></li> + <li><a href="../authors/lynn-margulis.html">MARGULIS</a></li> + <li><a href="../authors/gilbert-simondon.html">SIMONDON</a></li> + <li><a href="../authors/subrosa.html">SUBROSA</a></li> + <li><a href="../authors/etc.html">Etc.</a></li> + </ul> + </nav> + </main> + </body> +</html> + |