diff options
| author | hellekin <hellekin@cepheide.org> | 2018-07-25 14:02:29 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | hellekin <hellekin@cepheide.org> | 2018-07-25 14:02:29 +0200 |
| commit | 8add2433424a5659d62037695ffe84d68cf32c96 (patch) | |
| tree | c43333cd6cc18a8104e07fef70c22ff297a60017 /deborah-lupton.html | |
| download | 3ts-reader-8add2433424a5659d62037695ffe84d68cf32c96.tar.gz | |
v0 of the reader
Diffstat (limited to 'deborah-lupton.html')
| -rwxr-xr-x | deborah-lupton.html | 179 |
1 files changed, 179 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/deborah-lupton.html b/deborah-lupton.html new file mode 100755 index 0000000..e388d41 --- /dev/null +++ b/deborah-lupton.html @@ -0,0 +1,179 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html> +<html> + <head> + <meta charset="UTF-8"> + <title> Ici THK — Cyberfeminism </title> + <link rel="stylesheet" href="assets/css/style.css"> + </head> + <body> + <header> + <h1> <a href="index.html">Ici THK</a> </h1> + <h2> Deborah Lupton </h2> + <h3> Sociology </h3> + </header> + <main> + <article> + <section id="author"> + <h4>About the Author</h4> + <p>Deborah Lupton worked already in 1993 on the analogy + between the communication of technology threats and of + diseases, she presents us the analogy that is voluntary + made between the computer and the body in a hygienic + society where we tend to rely on centralized organisation + to desinfect and sanitize our world. Since then the issue + of scale and control.</p> + </section> + <section id="sources"> + <h4>Sources</h4> + <p><a href="assets/BookChapt_TacticalBiopolitics_subRosa.pdf"> + <em>Panic computing: The viral metaphor and computer technology</em></a>, + Cultural Studies, 8:3, pp.556—568 ISSN 0950-2386</p> (Subrosa; 1999) + </section> + <section id="scare"> + <h4> Panic computing: The viral metaphor and computer technology </h4> + + <p>The unproblematic use of the term 'virus' applied to + technological artefacts, inspire ponderings on the wider + implications of the viral metaphor. The choice of + phraseology in textual accounts and talk, the discursive + devices used, recurrent lexical patterns in describing + things, events, groups or people is revealing of the + latent ideological layer of meaning of such + communications (van Dijk, 1990; Fowler, 1991). In + particular, the intertextuality, or the ways in which + texts selectively draw upon other texts, other cultural + forms and discourses to create meaning, indicates the + political and ideological functions of texts and delimits + the boundaries within which topics may be discussed + (Fairclough, 1992; Astroff and Nyberg, 1992). *The + nomination of a type of computer technology malfunction + as a 'virus'* is a highly significant and symbolic + linguistic choice of metaphor, used to make certain + connections between otherwise unassociated subjects and + objects, to give meaning to unfamiliar events, to render + abstract feelings and intangible processes concrete. In + doing so, the metaphor shapes perception, identity and + experience, going beyond the original association by + evoking a host of multiple meanings (Clatts and Mutchler, + 1989: 106-7). As Geertz has argued, '[i]n metaphor one + has.., a stratification of meaning, in which an + incongruity of sense on one level produces an influx of + significance on another' (1973: 210).</p> + </section> + <section id="viruses-and-the-computer-corpus"> + <h4>Viruses and the Computer Corpus</h4> + + <p>The present analysis examines in detail the + stratification of meaning evident in the widespread and + largely unquestioned adoption of the viral metaphor to + describe computer technology malfunction in popular + texts. It is argued that the viral metaphor used in the + context of computer technology draws upon a constellation + of discourses concerning body boundaries, erotic + pleasure, morality, invasion, disease and destruction. In + what follows, the meanings of the term 'virus' in the + medical context, the symbiotic relationship between body + and computer metaphorical systems, the symbolic danger of + viruses, the seductiveness of the human/computer, + Self/Other relationship and the cultural crisis around + issues of bodies, technologies and sexualities at the fin + de millénnium are discussed to illuminate the ambivalent + relationship of humans with computer technology in late + capitalist societies.</p> + </section> + <section id="morality-and-viral-politics"> + <h4>Morality and viral politics</h4> + + <p>There are no "good" Germs or 'normal Germs; all Germs are + bad' (Helman, 1978: 118-19). To counter this attack, as + Cindy Patton points out, bodies are visualized as being + 'filled with tiny defending armies whose mission [is] to + return the "self" to the precarious balance of health' + (Patton, 1990: 60). The immune system is commonly + described in popular and medical texts as mounting a + 'defence' or 'siege' against 'murderous' viruses or + bacteria which are 'fought', 'attacked' or 'killed' by + white blood cells, drugs or surgical procedures (Martin, + 1990; Montgomery, 1991). This military discourse, + redolent with images of physical aggression, has become + routine and standardized to the point where its + metaphorical origins are erased: it is now a 'dead' + metaphor (Montgomery, 1991: 350).</p> + </section> + <section id="the-seduction-and-terror-of-cyberspace"> + <h4>The seduction and terror of cyberspace</h4> + <p>The viral metaphor has been adopted in computing + terminology to express the meanings of rapid spread and + invisible invasion of an entity that is able to reproduce + itself and causes malfunctioning on the systemic + level. It is telling that this alternative use has been + so readily accepted that at least one Australian medical + journal has featured articles on computer viruses devoted + to making explicit the similarities between biological + viruses and computer viruses (Dawes, 1992a, 1992b). Just + as the immune system is described in terms of military + imagery, popular accounts of computer viruses commonly + employ the terminology of war to conceptualize the + struggle between technological order and chaos. [....] + Ways of describing computer technology have both created + new terminology which has entered the language and have + drawn upon elements of older, more established lexical + systems. In particular, drawing upon the centuries-old + body/machine discourse, there has developed a symbiotic + metaphorical relationship between computers and humans, + in which computers have been anthropomorphized while + humans have been portrayed as 'organic computers' + (Berman, 1989: 7).The immune system is also commonly + described as an information-processing system, + communicating by means of hormones. By this imagery, + there occurs 'the transformation of the human subject + into an object, a repository, or else a collision site, + for various types of detectable and useable information' + (Montgomery, 1991: 383). Indeed, according to Haraway, + bodies have conceptually become cyborgs + (cyberneticorganisms), that is, 'techno-organic, humanoid + hybrids' (Haraway, 1990:21), or compounds of machine and + body theorized in terms of communications, for which + disease may be conceptualized as 'a subspecies of + information malfunction or communications pathology' + (Haraway, 1989: 15).</p> + </section> + <section id="the-viral-metaphor-and-technophobia"> + <h4>The viral metaphor and technophobia</h4> + <p>At the fin de millénnium, the body is a site of toxicity, + contamination and catastrophe, subject to and needful of + a high degree of surveillance and control. Kroker and + Kroker (1988:10 ff.) term the contemporary obsession + with clean bodily fluids as 'Body McCarthyism', an + hysterical new temperance movement. [...] 'Panic + Computing' invokes '[t]he underlying moral imperative + ... You can't trust your best friend's software any more + than you can trust his or her bodily fluids - safe + software or no software at all!' (Ross, 1991: 108). The + insertion of an 'infected' disk, that is a 'carrier' of + corruption, spells disaster for the integrity of the + computer corpus. Just as people are exhorted to grill + their sexual partners for details of their past intimate + lives, so as to be 'sure and safe' before proceeding to + exchange bodily fluids, so they are warned to verify the + source and safety of the computer disks they insert into + their PCs (Sontag, 1989: 167).</p> + </section> + </article> + <nav> + <ul> + <li><a href="bernard-aspe.html">ASPE</a></li> + <li><a href="karen-barad.html">BARAD</a></li> + <li><a href="muriel-combes.html">COMBES</a></li> + <li><a href="stephane-lupasco.html">LUPASCO</a></li> + <li><a href="deborah-lupton.html">LUPTON</a></li> + <li><a href="lynn-margulis.html">MARGULIS</a></li> + <li><a href="gilbert-simondon.html">SIMONDON</a></li> + <li><a href="subrosa.html">SUBROSA</a></li> + <li><a href="etc.html">Etc.</a></li> + </ul> + </nav> + </main> + </body> +</html> + |