1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
|
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
<title> Ici THK — Les Forces Francaises de l'Interieur parlent aux francais </title>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="../assets/css/style.css">
</head>
<body>
<header>
<h1> <a href="../index.html">Ici THK</a> </h1>
<h2> Stéphane LUPASCO </h2>
<h3> Affectivité </h3>
</header>
<main>
<article>
<aside>
<section id="about-the-author">
<h2>About the Author</h2>
<p>Stéphane LUPASCO, un Roumain à Paris, philosophe et professeur à La Sorbonne, a remis en question la logique Aristotélicienne à l'aûne de la physique quantique naissante. Il propose une tri-dialectique de l'énergie, physique tendant vers l'homogénéisation, biologique tendant vers l'hétérogénéisation, et psychique, correspondant à la logique de l'énergie au niveau micro-physique, tendant vers un état de plus haute contradiction, l'Ètat T, lieu de l'affectivité, à mi-chemin dans l'actualisation et la potentialisation des antagonistes.</p>
</section>
<section id="sources">
<h2>Sources</h2>
</section>
</aside>
<section id="antagonistic-dualism">
<h3>Antagonistic Dualism</h3>
<p>In a general way, one must link the rational and the
irrational, identity and non-identity, the invariant and the
variant [...] by the constitutive relation of contradictory
complementarity, of a duality of dynamic terms, with a principal
double aspect, including, for each term, the passage from
potential to actual and the passage from actual to potential,
each of the terms acting on the other. One must avoid the
sterile parallelist conception of contradictory orders, as well
as a monism favoring one order, by applying the notion of error
or appearance to the other.</p>
</section>
<section id="the-logic-of-energy">
<h3>The Logic of Energy</h3>
<p>Energy must possess a logic that is not a classic logic nor
any other based on a principle of pure non-contradiction, since
energy implies a contradictory duality in its own nature,
structure and function. The contradictory logic of energy is a
real logic, that is, a science of logical facts and operations,
and not a psychology, phenomenology or epistemology.</p>
</section>
</article>
<nav>
<ul>
<li><a href="bernard-aspe.html">ASPE</a></li>
<li><a href="karen-barad.html">BARAD</a></li>
<li><a href="muriel-combes.html">COMBES</a></li>
<li><a href="stephane-lupasco.html">LUPASCO</a></li>
<li><a href="deborah-lupton.html">LUPTON</a></li>
<li><a href="lynn-margulis.html">MARGULIS</a></li>
<li><a href="gilbert-simondon.html">SIMONDON</a></li>
<li><a href="subrosa.html">SUBROSA</a></li>
<li><a href="etc.html">Etc.</a></li>
</ul>
</nav>
</main>
</body>
</html>
|
